Plenary session
Is aid effective in reducing violence?
Opening remarks
Marjeta Jager, Deputy Director General, DG INTPA
Rachel M. Gisselquist, Senior Research Fellow, UNU-WIDER
Keynote | Is aid effective in reducing violence? | Anke Hoeffler, University of Konstanz
Can aid be effective in preventing, reducing and treating the consequences of violence? Although the provision of security to all their citizens is a state’s fundamental duty, over 50 countries experienced armed conflict in 2021. The international development community has identified armed conflict as an impediment to development and provides considerable resources to reduce armed conflicts. However, other forms of violence, such as homicide and assault, are vastly more prevalent, and far more widely distributed across countries, than is armed conflict. For some time scholars in the field of public health have been arguing for putting interpersonal violence higher on domestic and international policy agendas. Analysing the allocation of aid by purpose, it is obvious that donors and recipients have so far not recognized interpersonal violence as a major development issue: less than one percent of total ODA is targeted at interpersonal violence. I argue that interpersonal violence, in particular against women and children, is highly prevalent in low income countries. Often there is an overhang from armed conflict, the war stopped but the violence continues within the communities and inside the homes. What exactly should be defined as interpersonal violence depends on moral arguments and cultural standards and this debate covers some fiercely contested issues. I offer a systematic attempt to bring together available data of the rates of the different forms of violence, their associated costs and anti-violence interventions that can that can assist policy shapers to guide efforts in preventing and reducing violence.